Frequently Asked Questions
Below are listed some frequently asked questions concerning human participantsresearch, along with brief answers. All of these topics are addressed more thoroughly inthe Policy manual.
What is human participants research?
“Human participants research” is defined as a systematic investigation designed to develop or contribute to generalizable knowledge, which involves the collection of data from or about living human beings (see Chapter 3 of the policy manual for more details on defining research).
Why must it be reviewed?
It is University policy to reasonably ensure that the rights and welfare of human participants are adequately protected in research conducted under its auspices. In addition, both federal and state laws require this protection. In order for the University to fulfill its responsibility, all human participants research conducted under University auspices must receive appropriate review and approval.
Who reviews it?
The University has authorized Institutional Review Boards for each campus and university program to review and approve human participants research.
Who must submit it?
Human participants research must be reviewed if it is conducted by any faculty, staff, student, or any person under the auspices of Antioch University.
How is it submitted?
When does it have to be submitted?
When submitting projects, sufficient time should be allowed for adequate review. The IRB meeting schedules are posted on campus/program websites.
How will it be reviewed?
The review of human participants research is confined solely to procedures affecting the rights and welfare of human participants. No evaluation is made of the content or scientific merit of the project, unless participants are found to be "at risk," at which time the risk/benefit ratio of the project will be evaluated. The review focuses on such issues as risk to participants, voluntary participation, informed consent, and confidentiality.
The review of human participants research at Antioch University is a collaborative process intended to result in mutually acceptable research procedures which accomplish the investigator's scientific objectives while protecting the rights and welfare of the participants. The IRB tries to be as flexible as possible and reviews each project as a separate case rather than imposing rigid requirements. Every attempt is made to take into account all factors in determining the outcome of the review. The IRB sees its role as primarily educational and encourages consultation at all stages of the research process.
Where can I get assistance?
Each campus and university program has an IRB Chair and several IRB members. Your campus/program may designate specific departmental representatives as well. Please see the campus/program websites for specific information.